Search for: "Mays v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 53,724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
As the change of gender and first name was acquired, the United Kingdom was also still a Member State. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
L. 112-40 (2011) applied to PUA benefits, as PUA benefits qualify as an “unemployment compensation program of the United States” for which a minimum 15% administrative concealment penalty must be charged. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
Any other nonimmigrant in the United States may not engage in any employment unless he has been accorded a nonimmigrant classification which authorizes employment or he has been granted permission to engage in employment in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:51 am
Garland, 593 U.S. 155, 171–72 (2021); United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
United Healthcare of Ariz., Inc. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC’s Allegations The FTC alleges that the proposed acquisition would violate the law in several ways: (i) it would result in the elimination of significant head-to-head competition between the handbag brands; (ii) it would significantly increase concentration in an alleged market for “accessible luxury” handbags in the United States; (iii) it would result in significant effects on the wages, benefits and working conditions of employees of the merging parties;… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
See Adolph v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
SEC, No. 20-61007 (5th Cir. 2020), a case currently under review at the United States Supreme Court, which similarly assesses the SEC’s powers in enforcing securities law. [read post]
