Search for: "McCann v. McCann" Results 161 - 180 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by Warren K. Zola
  Not surprisingly, our own Michael McCann (@McCannSportsLaw) was listed. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:44 am by admin
  Join us as Laura Simpson and David Tucker from McCann Truth Central, McCann’s global thought leadership unit, share the extraordinary insights gleaned from this important study. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:55 am by Josh Wright
 McCann discusses the implications of O’Bannon’s motion to expand the class to include current players: The prospect of O’Bannon v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 6:00 am by Warren K. Zola
With one strategic maneuver, the plaintiffs in the O'Bannon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:00 pm by Marc Edelman
_____________________________________________________________________________As the White v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:58 am by Daniel McCarthy
Other courts have denied or limited discover of a party’s social media content where there was no showing that the information sought would reveal relevant evidence: McCann v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Giancristoforo; and David McCann (“Petitioners”) took their grievances with the ongoing expansion project at Philadelphia International Airport (“PHL”) to the 3rd Circuit Federal Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm by SJM
Dixon v UK has now reached a conclusion in the ECHR with an Order made on 21/2/12 removing the case from the lists under Art 37 (1)(c) of the Convention.This Order is the Court’s response to a unilateral declaration made by the UK government on 8/11/11 accepting that Mr Dixon had not had the benefit of a proportionality exercise in line with the principles set out in McCann, Pinnock and Powell and that the High Court’s obiter findings on… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm by SJM
Dixon v UK has now reached a conclusion in the ECHR with an Order made on 21/2/12 removing the case from the lists under Art 37 (1)(c) of the Convention.This Order is the Court’s response to a unilateral declaration made by the UK government on 8/11/11 accepting that Mr Dixon had not had the benefit of a proportionality exercise in line with the principles set out in McCann, Pinnock and Powell and that the High Court’s obiter findings on… [read post]