Search for: "McKenna v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
When the issue is whether a seller can participate in the secondary market for the trademarked goods, we may need what Mark McKenna calls channeling doctrines (Dastar, for example) to prevent trademark owners from getting more than what trademark gives them. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
The Rogers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor, heard 30… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:45 am
., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
If our commercial speech doctrine doesn’t soon start recognizing this, the regulatory state will be in trouble. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm
" (United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:19 am
Dutch Jackson IATG, LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
Plaintiff has failed to make the requisite evidentiary showing establishing merit to her proposed amended claim (Joyce v McKenna Assoc. , supra; Morgan v Prospect Park Assocs. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
The case is McKenna v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:16 am
McKenna, 178 P.3d 1198, 1201 (Colo. 2008) (“[A] claim under the TCPA for $500 in liquidated damages per violation is a penalty that cannot be assigned); Kaplan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:57 am
She left the court and her client during a hearing, stating that she (among other things) "truly, is not here. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
On Wednesday 1st December, the Court will hand down judgment in Fratila and another v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:32 pm
United States Sixth Circuit, 08/17/2010 McKenna v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm
R (on the application of Majera (formerly SM (Rwanda)) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – heard 10th May 2021. [read post]
