Search for: "McKenzie v. McKenzie"
Results 161 - 180
of 394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 10:13 pm
McKenzie. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
” The McKenzie friend in RP v Notts was of course John Hemming MP. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
On Wednesday 16 November the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Phillip McKenzie v The Queen. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
Some of them become the vexatious litigants-in-person, or ‘professional’ McKenzie Friends of nightmares. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:35 am
Buddy Lee Bailey v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Trivial Defect DoctrineIn the case of McKenzie v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:04 am
(RTI) v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:08 pm
”The case in question, Christmas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
This argument was rejected in favour of tackling each separate objection to the claim language step-by-step.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic reported on a recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, which held that the shape of Land Rover Defender cars cannot benefit from trade mark protection, bearing neither inherent nor acquired distinctiveness.OtherFormer GuestKat Laetitia Lagarde (Baker McKenzie) pointed to a number of ways in which IP lawyers are well-placed to… [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:04 am
(RTI) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:04 am
(RTI) v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]
22 May 2010, 2:44 pm
McKenzie, an orthopaedic surgeon. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:55 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Morgan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:42 pm
McKenzie. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:13 am
Baker & McKenzie (3) 50. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:10 am
The answer, it seems, is when it is an application for a rehearing, according to the Court of Appeal in Turner v Turner [2008] EWCA Civ 280. [read post]
