Search for: "Meals v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2018, 9:26 am by Michael Lowe
Today, the town of La Grange promotes the Chicken Ranch as “the Oldest Continually Operating Non-Floating Whorehouse in the United States when it shuttered its doors in 1973,” and offers “souvenirs and memorabilia” at its online gift shop. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The Claimants were involved in issuing meal vouchers for use at supermarkets and restaurants. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
Since 2012, she has headed the Post Conviction Unit and she reviews claims of actual innocence. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 12:16 pm by Larry
Court of International Trade in Mondiv v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by David Post
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
United States, in which the five conservatives reunited in a 5–4 majority holding that “money compensation” does not include employee stock options. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]