Search for: "Means v. Brooks" Results 161 - 180 of 897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
They spoke about what this Trump administration effort reveals about the relationship between presidents and the intelligence community: David Priess shared a Lawfare Live event with the Michael V. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:24 am
”/But you don’t mean it [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Marriage for both couples means that the tax burden will: Decrease for both couples (relative to when they were single) Decrease for one member of the couple while leaving the other’s unchanged Decrease for one member and increase the other’s Increase for one and leave the other’s unchanged Increase it for both, depending on the rate schedule (see above) for married couples.[13] Distinguishing the couple’s and second-earner penalties is an exercise in locating the… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Giles Peaker
Does this, as was found in the first appeal, and in Caridon Property Ltd v Monty Shooltz, mean that no section 21 notice can ever be served by the landlord, even if a valid gas safety record is subsequently provided? [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
This does not mean, however, that indirect purchaser class actions can or should never be certified. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The Child Tax Credit (CTC) is a partially-refundable tax credit available to parents with qualifying dependents under the age of 17. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Milad Emamian
Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]