Search for: "Meredith v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
Mr Justice MostynIn Fisher Meredith LLP v JH & Anor [2012] EWHC 408 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn considered an appeal against a wasted costs order made against the wife's solicitors in financial remedy proceedings.The case involved a company in which the husband had been allocated shares, which he claimed he had only ever held as a nominee for his uncle "and/or" his uncle's brothers. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
  The trial court recognized that the multi-step procedures articulated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Holly Doremus
Bandza, In Brief, South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:33 pm by INFORRM
Comment This decision follows others where actions have been struck out as a result of limited publication, see Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)), Bezant v Rausing [2007] EWHC 1118 (QB): McBride v Body Shop Int Plc [2007] EWHC 1658 (QB) and Noorani v Calver [2009] EWHC 561. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:07 pm by Dan Tokaji
McDonald Book Review Voter Fraud in the United States: Real or Imagined? [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:09 am by Phil
Inducement to Infringe - In light of the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Global-Tech v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:28 am by admin
Meredith Cross, the director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, said in a statement that the agency is disappointed by the court’s ruling. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]