Search for: "Michael Kun" Results 161 - 180 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2012, 10:17 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
By:  Michael Kun This morning, the California Supreme Court has just issued its long-awaited decision in the Brinker case regarding meal and period requirements. [read post]
by Michael Kun and Kathryn McGuigan In recent years, the alleged misclassification of employees under California’s wage and hour laws has been a hotly contested issue and the subject of a great many class actions. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:03 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
by Michael Kun As we have mentioned previously on thisblog, the latest wave of wage-hour class actions to hit California employers is based on a claim that employees were not provided "suitable seating" under an obscure provision of California’s Wage Orders. [read post]
by Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen In recent years, some plaintiffs’ counsel bringing wage-hour claims have have made the strategic decision to bring "hybrid" class actions; that is, actions alleging both federal and state wage-hour claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:51 am by Kara M. Maciel
By Amy Traub, Michael Kun and Anna Kolontyrsky As employers know, not only are FLSA collective actions more prevalent than ever, but they can be costly to defend or resolve. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:42 pm by Epstein Becker Green
By Michael Kun Employers with operations in California have become aware in recent years of an obscure provision in California Wage Orders that requires “suitable seating” for some employees. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:49 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
By Amy Traub, Michael Kun and Anna Kolontyrsky As employers know, not only are FLSA collective actions more prevalent than ever, but they can be costly to defend or resolve. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:16 am by Epstein Becker Green
By Michael Kun Several years ago, employees in California began filing class action lawsuits against their employers alleging violations of the “suitable seating” provision buried in the state’s Wage Orders. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm by Aaron Olsen
By Michael Kun and Betsy Johnson                  In a much-anticipated decision, the California Supreme Court has expanded the scope of California’s complex wage-hour laws to non-resident employees who perform work in California. [read post]
by Michael Kun We have previously written in this blog about California’s unique “suitable seating” law, which requires some employers to “provide” “suitable seating” to some employees where “the nature of the work reasonably permits the use of seats. [read post]
By Michael Kun As we have written before in this space,  the latest wave of class actions in California is one alleging that employers have not complied with obscure requirements requiring the provision of “suitable seating” to employees – and that employees are entitled to significant penalties as a result. [read post]
By Michael Kun Employers with operations in California have become aware in recent years of an obscure provision in California Wage Orders that requires “suitable seating” for some employees. [read post]
by Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen Already besieged by wage-hour lawsuits, employers with operations in California may see more of these cases, or may be brought into wage-hour litigation where they might not have been before, as a result of a new decision by the California Supreme Court expanding the definition of "employer. [read post]