Search for: "Michel v. Executive Office"
Results 161 - 180
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Citizens - http://bit.ly/vkPXsF (Gibbons) Watchdog (SEC) v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am
This is a lawsuit brought by Twitter users and the Knight Foundation against President Trump (and his social media strategist and press secretary). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
“The scale of unlawful killings, including indicia of summary executions in areas to the north of Kyiv, is shocking,” Bachelet told the Human Rights Council. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Parker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25)… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
In a reply dated 7 December 2006, Mr Bateman advised as follows:…Dear Mr LanderThank you for your letter of 24 October 2006 to the Chief Executive, Dr Michele Bruniges about processes surrounding the invalidity retirement of Mr Boutsis. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am
Maître Audet, the Board’s General Counsel, noted some possible questions arising from the pending SCC York University v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
On Dec. 13, 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court published a 51-page judgment in Kohelet Forum v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Michelle Meyer, Geisinger Health System, (Still) Waiting to Exhale: Why the Future of Biospecimens Research Remains Unclear after the Final RuleMark Rothstein, University of Louisville School of Medicine, International Health ResearchNicolas Terry, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT 71. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:05 pm
" These "negative" forces include predicted secondary market "chaos" resulting from the Washington Square v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
And that’s just within the national security community of the executive branch; the gaps in understanding and trust are often even larger when extended to the whole of government. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Davis, Michele Estlund, Dr. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Davis, Michele Estlund, Dr. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
David Antonioli, Chief Executive Officer, Voluntary Carbon Standard Association, Washington, DC Carbon sector: issues not related to antitrust as much as green/greenwashing claims. [read post]
