Search for: "Milan v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
Last year, The IPKat reported on the decision of Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which found that “[T]he right of publicity cannot, consistent with First Amendment, be a right to control the celebrity’s image by censoring disagreeable portrayals. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
Out on the west, Alicante hosts the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, which administers Community trade marks and designs, while London, Paris and Milan are generally hives of IP activity, speculation and intrigue. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:39 am
But by the same token, decisions of courts in other member states can also provide useful guidance". [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
Okoro is an inmate housed at the Federal Correctional Institution in Milan, Michigan. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Patrick Huston, which “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
  In Bateman v Mnemonics (1996), the court there stated that because fair use is a statutory doctrine, fair use is not an infringement. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
This event, hosted in the Triennale Museum, Milan, was a mock trial of one of the most renowned creations by the Italian Chef Gualtiero Marchesi -- a risotto called “Riso oro e zafferano”. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
I would deny the application largely for the reasons stated in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Also, one can search for patents and what the state of affairs is concerning opt outs, oppositions and UPC cases. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]