Search for: "Miller, Appeal of" Results 161 - 180 of 4,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 2:31 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
My sense is that the Justices were unlikely to rule for Miller, but it is not clear to me whether they will reach the merits of some... [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:55 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Miller, 2024 Il App (1st) 230379 the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the dismissal of a legal malpractice lawsuit. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:45 am by Bonny Rafel
Rafel have already been citing these important cases in our briefs to the Court and in our appeals. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm by Michael Ausbrook
I haven't seen any of his arguments.Here's the court's blurb on the case:The LaPorte Circuit Court ordered that Miller be placed in restraints during his trial and the Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished memorandum decision, Miller v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:29 pm
-Houston 2008), Miller says that the Houston 14th CoA was correct in finding that hearsay testimony about a defendant's disputed confession was inadmissible, but that's when the ruling jumps the rails:So, Aguilar won his appeal, right? [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:02 pm
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, the Administrative Office of the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:49 am by Ray Dowd
 fee applications should argue the "big picture" questions of policy and deterrence.In Roger Miller, plaintiffs unsuccessfully appealed one of the trial court determinations, then failed to break out the time expended on that appeal. [read post]
30 May 2008, 10:21 pm
The Miller decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals has caused quite a stir in the Michigan legal and business communities. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 4:38 pm by Howard Bashman
“Black Pa. man can sue state trooper he claims arrested him based only on his race, U.S. appeals court says”: Matt Miller of The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania has this report on a ruling that the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Seidner-Miller, Inc., ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Mar. 27, 2019), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) considered Civil Code section 1782, which states that a CLRA action for damages cannot be maintained unless (a) the plaintiff has made an appropriate pre-filing demand that the defendant "correct, repair, replace, or otherwise rectify" the violation; and (b) the defendant failed to "give" the consumer "an appropriate correction, repair,… [read post]