Search for: "Miller v. City & County of S. F." Results 161 - 180 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Keeping CEQA In Its Lane: First District Holds Substantial Evidence Supports EIR’s Conclusion That “Urban Decay” Is Not Reasonably Foreseeable Indirect Effect Of Project Relocating Trial Court Operations From Historic Placerville Courthouse
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Placerville Historic Preservation League v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses CEQA Baseline Issues In Partially Published Opinion Upholding EIR For Carlsbad Shopping Mall Renovation
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am by Arthur F. Coon
North County Advocates v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Justice Scalia’s Enduring CEQA and Land Use Law Legacy
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
I represented the League of California Cities and three individual counties in filing an amici curiae brief in the California Supreme Court’s much-anticipated and recently decided “CEQA-in-reverse” case, California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A “Fare” Shake? Ninth Circuit Affirms Judgment On the Pleadings for San Francisco In Removed Action Challenging SFMTA’s 2018 Taxi Regulations, Remands for Consideration of Whether to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Amend CEQA Claim
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco, et al. (9th Cir. 2020) ___ F.3d ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Limits of CEQA Mitigation – Recent Judicial Applications of Nollan and Dolan
18 Nov 2014, 11:15 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (N.D. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Discovery Rule Does Not Postpone Accrual of CEQA Cause of Action; Events Specified In CEQA Statute of Limitations Provide Constructive Notice of Project Approval or Commencement
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“The Year in CEQA: A Look Back”
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Affirms Judgment Upholding Statutory CEQA Exemption For Housing Project Consistent With EIR-Reviewed Specific Plan, Rejects Claims That Changes In Project Or Circumstances Required Subsequent EIR
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Spring CEQA Roundup – 2020
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing, e.g., Rich v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Connecting The CEQA Dots? Supreme Court Holds Friant Ranch Project EIR’s Air Quality Impacts Discussion Insufficiently Relates Pollutant Data To Specific Adverse Human Health Effects
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sep. 29 - Oct. 3, 2008: US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Elam &;amp; Miller, P.S.C. v. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Cases - http://www.sixthcircuitcases.com/
Fight On! After Grant and Transfer, Second District Holds Upon Reconsideration that Resident Noise Does Not Preclude CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption for USC Area Housing Development Project; But Also Holds City Must First Find Project Consistent With Redevelopment Plan Incorporated Into Zoning Before Granting Exemption
18 Nov 2024, 10:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
(f).) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Holds CEQA Does Not Authorize “Remedy” of “Limited EIR” To Augment Deficient MND; Rather, Full EIR Must Be Prepared Where Substantial Evidence Supports Fair Argument That Any Aspect Of Project May Have Significant Environmental Effect
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
Metropolitan Water Dist. (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 382, 402 & fn. 11; Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Holds Cap-And-Trade Program Compliance Supports Refinery Project EIR’s Conclusion That GHG Emissions Are Less Than Significant, Also Addresses Important CEQA Baseline and Railroad Operation Preemption Issues
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court noted its analysis was “compatible with North County Advocates v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
In the Supreme Court w/c 17 July 2017
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Cardiff & Vale University Health Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors, heard 26 Apr 2017. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
“Sauce For The Gander”: Second District Holds CEQA’s Broad Definition Of “Project” Also Applies In Determining Scope of Activity To Which Statutory Exemption Applies
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  County of Ventura v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“For the Record”: Fourth District Holds CEQA’s “Mandatory” And “Broadly Inclusive” Administrative Record Statute Requires Lead Agency To Retain Documents Within Its Scope And Not Destroy Them Prior To Record Preparation
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part I: The Fourth Circuit’s Reliance on Pre- and Post-Inauguration Statements
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Federal Eminent Domain Procedures
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
One Parcel of Land in Prince George’s County,6 a federal district court found standing, noting that not only do the federal courts have a right to determine who among competing claimants is entitled to payments of compensation, but also that this the decision may be made as a preliminary matter. [read post]
Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski Journal - https://ackerman-ackerman.com/journal/
Not A CEQA “Project”? Not So Fast, Lead Agency! Supreme Court Reverses Fourth District’s Decision That San Diego’s Adoption of Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Was Not A Project Requiring CEQA Review
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com