Search for: "Miller v. Georgia" Results 161 - 180 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Conceptualizing Online Social Networking Privacy Concerns , Nan Zhang, Chong (Alex) Wang, Elena Karahannaand Yan Xu, University of Jyväskylä – Computer Science and Information System, City University of Hong Kong, University of Georgia – C. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am by Stephen Wermiel
The obscenity standard deeply split the court throughout the 1960s until the court settled on a rule in 1973 in Miller v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Shea Denning
Miller as pinging simply is not part and parcel of the provision of cellular phone service”). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
  The Supreme Court found such behavior “insupportable” in Miller v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The Committee to Protect Journalists had an alert “Journalists attacked by anti-LGBT demonstrators in Tbilisi, Georgia”. [read post]