Search for: "Minor v. State of Mississippi*" Results 161 - 180 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Take the example of carriage taxes at issue in the 1796 Supreme Court case of Hylton v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:01 pm
Yet Washington v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am by David Kopel
As the Young majority acknowledges, a minority of nineteenth century cases did deny that there is right to defensive carry; these cases start with Arkansas's 1842 State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[g]roups representing racial and ethnic minorities, veterans, and people with disabilities have joined the opposition in what’s become the latest in a series of battles against states’ efforts to restrict voting rights and combat alleged voter fraud. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
This year, one state enacted major new restrictions, while several states removed restrictions. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:38 pm by B.W. Barnett
Abstract: This Article argues that the majority opinion in the Supreme Court’s decision in Schneckloth v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:11 pm by Elie Mystal
News] * Recipients of the prestigious Rangel and Pickering fellowships, aimed at helping minority applicants get started at the State Department, have been told by Trump's State Department that only temporary, non-career positions are available to them this year. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
As the four dissenting Justices demonstrated, there was no “emergency” to justify the Court taking action without full briefing or argument.On February 7, Roberts again joined a four-Justice minority to dissent from the majority’s “shadow docket” decision in Merrill v. [read post]