Search for: "Montgomery County v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Montgomery County Teachers Federal Credit Union, No. 10-02781, 2012 WL 1994602 (D. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of AmericaDocket: 11-1139Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment, as interpreted by this Court in Jones v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:59 pm
District Court (also in Maryland, as it happens) threw out the indictment in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:13 am
United States, 468 U.S. 796, 806 (1984). [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
Williamson County v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
Williamson County v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Here, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in Montgomery County Hosp Dist v Brown makes clear that while an oral agreement can modify an employee’s at-will employment status, to do so, the employer must unequivocally indicate its “definite intent to be bound not to terminate the employee except under clearly specified circumstances. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
http://katzjustice.com Preparation for United States Supreme Court oral arguments requires exhaustive preparedness. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Redevelopment Auth. of County of Montgomery, No. 10-1047 (3d Cir Dec 9, 2011) // [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
United States, 525 F.3d 1139 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 14 (D.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
" On December 15, 2011, the United States Department of Justice issued the findings of the investigation it began in June 2008 in a letter addressed to Maricopa County Attorney William Montgomery. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:12 pm
Since then, the Attorney General and the state have refused to share enrollment and absentee data to anyone, including the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
State Bar 19 Cal. 3d 359 (1977) and Bates v. [read post]
