Search for: "Moon v. Moon" Results 161 - 180 of 854
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3: Shaping an Overall Approach to ProtectionIntroductions: Jerry Reichman and Estelle Derclaye  In what ways should different forms of protection be tailored to various types of subject matter (construed legally as forms of intellectual property, but also subject matter construed socially or commercially)? [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  But this year the moon wasn't quite right, so instead some Kat friends appeared in Chicago. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
” As John Kennedy said so very long ago, “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
(f) The term tidal waters means those waters that rise and fall in a predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:33 am
This Kat is always thinking.On the 1709 blog, Ken Moon discussed the Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit's case of Capitol Records v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
 However, this was dismissed in favour of Abraham Moon and Sons v Thornber [2012] EWPCC 37 (concerning the composition of a woollen plaid fabric, reported by The 1709 Blog here). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
”  That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:07 pm by David Post
And with respect to the small subset of "hate speech" that is not constitutionally protected—words that are an "incitement to violence" under the standard set forth in Brandenburg v. [read post]