Search for: "Moore v. District of Columbia"
Results 161 - 171
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
The firm is co-counsel in a fifth case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Tennessee: UCP of Middle Tennessee 1200 9th Avenue North, Suite 110 Nashville, TN 37208 Phone: (615) 242-4091 Fax: (615) 242-3582 E-mail: info@ucpnashville.org Web: http://www.ucpnashville.org UCP of the Mid-South 4189 Leroy Memphis, TN 38108 Phone: (901) 761-4277 Fax: (901) 761-7876 E-mail: ucp@ucpmemphis.org Web: http://www.ucpmemphis.org TENNESSEE STATE RESOURCES AGING Tennessee Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 500 Interstate… [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Moore Avenue, Ritter Hall Annex 423 Philadelphia, PA 19122 Phone: (215) 204-3862; (800) 204-PIAT (Toll Free) TTY: (800) 750-PIAT (Toll Free in PA) E-mail: piat@astro.temple.edu Web: http://disabilities.temple.edu Pennsylvania Assistive Technology Foundation (AFP) 102 Pickering Way, Suite 200 Exton, PA 19341 Phone: (484) 875-3066; (888) 744-1938 (Toll Free) TTY: (877) 693-7271 (Toll Free) Fax: (484) 875-0982 E-mail: patf@amexcenters.com Web: http://www.assistive-technology4pa.org … [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Moore (lawfulness of search following arrest that violates state law)06-1181 -- Dada v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
" Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 567 A.2d 398, 400-01 (Del. 1989).District of Columbia: Mampe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
In LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
If Virginia followed the District of Columbia's recent ruling in blank">Thomas v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:54 am
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp., 125 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir.1997)). [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 10:42 am
Recall the district court in Biogen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit today held that a federal statute, which imposes a tax on awards of compensatory damages for emotional distress and loss of reputation, is unconstitutional because such awards are not "income" within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment. [read post]
