Search for: "Morales v. Jones" Results 161 - 180 of 323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 5:20 pm by David Fraser
In all of the circumstances, costs in the amount of $1,000.00 will cover disbursements and legal costs.Interestingly, there is no mention of Jones v Tsige; the court only discusses PIPEDA cases.What's the moral of this story? [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 442 (1961) (upholding Sunday closing laws); Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:45 pm by Ann Marie Marciarille
Dep't of HEW) was lifted in May of last year by Judge Marcia Morales Howard. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:39 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court has held that there’s a compelling government interest in banning race discrimination in government-supported education (Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Quincy Jones sues Michael Jackson's estate over royalties http://t.co/CZJIJQgolm -> Canada-EU trade agreement presages IP reform http://t.co/bAOcdznhju -> Viacom v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 am
. ** In Jones v Filkins, 238 AD2d 954, the Appellate Division indicated that removal of an individual from public office is appropriate in situations involving “self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trust The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_06141.htm. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:36 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Court of Appeal in Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:55 am by Giorgio Buono
Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti for the tip-off) Related posts:Little on Internet Choice of Law Governance Internet Defamation and Choice of Law in Dow Jones v Gutnick Italian Society of International Law’s XVIII Annual Meeting (Naples, 13-14 June 2013) [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While a court may possess the discretion to permit such an examination under appropriate circumstances, the defendant failed to demonstrate that such circumstances were present here akin to the cases of People v Earel and Peole v Jones. [read post]