Search for: "Mr. Wonderful, Inc"
Results 161 - 180
of 485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Is that copyright’s fault, wonders Eleonora? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Being the EPO not a EU institution, can a EU institution consider the complaints, wonders Merpel? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
It has a wonderful array of character actors: Ving Rhames, Steve Zahn, Dennis Farina, Don Cheadle, Albert Brooks, and the aforementioned Mr. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
FINPRO” (in Marsh) and “MRS. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Inspired by Mrs Kat, in turn inspired by an article posted on Yahoo! [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Is the CJEU’s decision as original as that delightful piece of design, wonders Jeremy? [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
I also wonder whether the learned judge should have defined what ‘success’ would be in the present case. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
., Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
Shawn Olson of Minnesota was offered a job in West Virginia by Push, Inc., a company based in Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Pro-Football Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Pro-Football Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 10:46 am
Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
To make matters even more interesting, the litigation is somewhat a family affair.Harry Winston Inc. was founded by Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
Mr Alexander made general submissions regarding the potential dangers associated with grant of registered trade mark protection on an excessively wide basis, which would be likely to inhibit fair competition and adversely affect the proper operation of the market. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
She found that without extreme provocation “Aguirre repeatedly reviled Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
MR. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
MR. [read post]
