Search for: "Mullins v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
United States, U.S., No. 10-1337. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:24 am
Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Solis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:26 am
United States is an example of a medical mistake that had a devastating impact on the lives of a local family. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLPDocket: 10-1339Issue(s): Whether under the implied preemption principles in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
United States, et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:46 am
Mullins, et al v City Of New York, US Court Of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket No. 09-3435-cv The Fair Labor Standards Act, subject to certain exceptions, mandates overtime pay for employees who work more than 40 hours per week. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:17 pm
In Mullins v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am
This was the first published state court decision in California regarding employment arbitration agreements since the United States Supreme Court's groundbreaking decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm
Plaintiffs pled the above claims in a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its widely-anticipated decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post Grant Blog) Lux – Similar products sold by unrelated defendants not warrant joinder in patent cases: Rude d/b/a ABT Sys., LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:45 am
United Airlines, Inc., 178 Cal. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina ordered defendant Bright Builders, Inc. to pay $770,750.00 in damages for contributory trademark infringement as the result of a jury verdict against it for constructing and providing web hosting services to a company it knew to be infringing on third parties’ trademarks. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
On March 1, 2011, the United States Supreme Court held in Staub v. [read post]
