Search for: "Murphy v. U.s.*"
Results 161 - 180
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
Discover Bank v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
INS v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
In its June 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Judge Murphy authored a 23-page dissent. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Murphy, which was pending before the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Murphy, which was pending before the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
As to the latter, plaintiff contends that she meets the burden articulated by the Second Circuit in Brunner v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Although the Supreme Court in Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:23 pm
See Gilmer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am
* FTC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 9:14 pm
" Judge Murphy filed a concurring opinion supporting the Court's decision to follow Shular. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Pate v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm
(The Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 4:52 am
Murphy” defense in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
