Search for: "Murphy v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm
Lopez (268-281) United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:58 am
Thank goodness Clarence Gideon did not have to appear opposite you in 1963 and instead, he wrote a five page petition for writ of cert to the highest court in our land, the United States Supreme Court, which ultimately handed down the decision of Gideon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
United States and Stuart v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm
Murphy was decided with a one-sentence per curiam opinion: "The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Murphy was decided with a one-sentence per curiam opinion: “The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:26 am
In the 2018 case, Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Murphy’s exemption leaves structures with fewer than four units unregulated. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
Most recently, in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Jsutice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the standard for a state criminal subpoena should be the "demonstrated, specific need" test adopted by the Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
Justice Thomas recognized this analysis in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 4:15 am
Jerry Seinfeld et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Case No. 18-cv-01196. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Murphy was a racist bigot. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Rather, in Wilson v. [read post]
