Search for: "NORTH CENTRAL SERVICES INC v HA" Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
BLANSHINE and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellees. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Condominiums -- Registered agent -- No merit to argument that service of process on registered agent of corporation qualified to transact business in Florida must comply with hierarchical provisions of section 48.081(1)(a)-(d)VERABELLA FALLS CONDOMINIUM, ASSOCIATION, INC. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
July 2011 has a couple of articles dealing with the recent US Supreme Court decision of AT & T Mobility v Concepcion. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am by Tomassi Law Associates
The firm has the ability to defeat the Chapter 7 petition by putting itself in Chapter 11. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
[T]here has to be a limit somewhere. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm by George Lenard
FBL Financial Services, Inc., under which the age discrimination “standard of causation” is different than the “motivating factor” one forming the basis for the Staub decision. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Alpharma USPD, Inc., 887 So.2d 881, 886 (Ala. 2004); Orr v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Medicaid Services: SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE IF CALIFORNIA CAN CUT MEDICAID PAYMENTS, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Fairbanks Scales Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D North Carolina: When an assignor is not stopped: Borgwarmer v Honeywell (Property, intangible) Bull in Bilski’s china shop: B of A’s financial instrument: Ex Parte Birle (12:01 Tuesday) District Court S D Florida: Court labels claims transformed in patent reexamination mere disguise: Aspex Eyewear v Marchon Eyewear (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court S D California:… [read post]