Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 161 - 180 of 1,805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
It claims to process over 250 million devices per month within the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
An option would be to provide for greater state agency involvement with authority to review settlements. [read post]
This would confer protected status based on sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]