Search for: "Nix v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
  Sec. 154 states that a patent grant shall be for a term beginning on the date on which the patent issues and ending 20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains certain specific references to an earlier filed application or applications, from the date on which the earliest such application was filed. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 1:04 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces nixed the Crawford prohibition on urinalysis laboratory reports in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 2:47 am
(United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Orlando Division)Civil Action No.: 6:07-CV-0227-ORL-22JGGFile No. 072 3021 Link to the case documents [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
The en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:06 pm
United States) is the European court system's repudiation of the British military justice system in Findlay v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:17 am
  The court also went on to consider whether the inquiries were also a violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against searches and decided that they weren't, since all of the information had been given to third-parties and thus was no longer subject to a reasonable expectation of privacy by the personnel under the Supreme Court's holding in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:50 am
United States, 487 U.S. 533, 108 S.Ct. 2529, 101 L.Ed.2d 472 (1988) (finding illegally seized evidence admissible where the same evidence was subject to government subpoena); Nix v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
See Brief For United States As Amicus Curiae, Buckman Co. v. [read post]