Search for: "Non Insurer Defendants" Results 161 - 180 of 7,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 4:01 pm by Sandra Kaczmarczyk
The trial court ruled against West Bend on summary judgment, holding that the insurer owed the salon a duty to defend. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 2:55 pm
 The Insured did not disclose to the Defendant Insurers that there was a potential claim from the Third Party. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
Does it mean that insurers can’t have exclusions that preclude coverage for defense expenses for non-covered claims? [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  First responders were called to the scene, but they found him non-responsive and knew there was nothing they could do save him. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:07 am by Andrew Frisch
 As discussed here, Defendant, a life insurance agency, argued that plaintiffs, its life insurance brokers, were exempt from the FLSA’s overtime provisions pursuant to the so-called retail sales exemption. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:33 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
In light of this case, defendants charged with insurance fraud by means of false statements cannot assert non-payment by the carrier as a defense to the charge. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In this case, there was a dispute as to liability insurance coverage provided by a family automobile insurance policy containing a non-owner's endorsement. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mason County Title Insurance Co.: Opinion Mason County Title Opening Brief [COA] Robbins Opening Brief [COA] Robbins Reply Brief [COA] Mason County Title Petition for Review Robbins Answer to Petition for Review Mason County Title Supplemental Brief [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 6:59 pm
And sadly, there was no other source of recovery--no UM/UIM, and no chance at recovering personal assets of the defendant driver. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:30 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
If there is a waiver of subrogation that the insurer does not know about at the time of entering into the contract, that may be a material non-disclosure. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by Diane Polscer
’s motion for summary judgment that it had no duty to defend its insured, Schorno, against claims of sexual abuse.The plaintiffs in the underlying case alleged that Schorno engaged in a pattern of intentional, non-accidental conduct, including sexual abuse of a child and intentional infliction of emotional distress, as well as negligent infliction of emotional distress and negligent supervision of a minor. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Defendants eventually moved for summary judgment on the cancellation, proof of loss, and non-cooperation grounds. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 11:07 pm
Liability insurers would be well advised to study both this and its predecessor decisions and, expecially in the Third Department, affirmatively advise their insureds of their right to independent counsel at the insurer's expense where there exists a covered/non-covered claim situation. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by Geoffrey B. Fehling and Andrew S. Koelz
Defense-within-limits provisions—resulting in what is called “eroding” or “wasting” policies—reduce the policy’s applicable limit of insurance by amounts the insurer pays to defend the policyholder against a claim or suit. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
CGL - LATE NOTICE - GOOD FAITH BELIEF IN NON-LIABILITYNorth Country Ins. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:11 pm by WIMS
And an insurer considering going to trial would be economically rational in doing so if the expected value of prevailing at all exceeds the expected cost of defending the lawsuit. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 1:55 pm by Larry Golub
  Federal contended that Steadfast and Liberty, as primary insurers, had a duty to defend; and because the insurers had a duty to defend, Federal’s duty to defend under its umbrella coverage did not attach. [read post]