Search for: "North Dakota v. Minnesota"
Results 161 - 180
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
On the eve of its effective date, a North Dakota federal court issued a preliminary injunction to temporarily prevent the Rule from going into effect in the 13 states involved in the North Dakota litigation. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
Bonus points: was mocked by children; February 2015, Fargo, North Dakota: Driver probably charged under municipal code because the state law seems to apply only to highways or public or private areas “to which the public has … access for vehicular use”; December 2015, Manitoba, Canada: see above. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:45 am
The cases, two from North Dakota and one from Minnesota, all concern states with unique legislation that allows them to prosecute individuals for refusing an alcohol test. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
North Dakota, 14-1468, and its alliterative pals, Bernard v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:06 pm
Thirteen states have such laws.The court took up the question in three cases: one from Minnesota and two from North Dakota, which were consolidated for a single argument.In 2013, in Missouri v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 2:32 pm
North Dakota [SCOTUSblog materials], consolidated with Bernard, William R. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 5:21 pm
North Dakota, Bernard v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
North Dakota (14-1468); Bernard v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:08 pm
The Justices took on three cases raising the issue: two from North Dakota and one from Minnesota. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:27 pm
North Dakota, Bernard v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
North Dakota, 14-1468 – challenge laws from Minnesota and North Dakota (respectively), which are among the thirteen states that make it a crime to refuse a test for blood-alcohol content. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm
The other states are Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
North, 135 Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:49 pm
But a recent case decided by the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota employers) highlights that certain stereotypes about older workers may persist. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn Litig., Nos. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
North Dakota: removed restrictions on carry in public parks, stores that sell liquor, and public highway rest areas. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Judicial memoirs and biographies include 8th Circuit Judge Myron Bright's Goodbye Mike, Hello Judge: My Journey for Justice (North Dakota State University Institute for Regional Studies), the Nebraska Federal District Judge Warren Urbom’s Called to Justice: The Life of a Federal Trial Judge (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press); and James Haskins's Cecil Poole: A Life in the Law. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Feb. 2, 2010) (affirming dismissal of distributor of OTC drug under Minnesota statute); Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
