Search for: "ORDER RELATING TO APPLICATIONS OR PETITIONS"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
At its Conference on June 26, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the constitutionality of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard under the Dormant Commerce Clause, the application of the “mass action” provision of the Class Action Fairness Act, the First Amendment rights of broadcasters, and establishing a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:21 pm
We have created a new facebook group to address the impact of the new executive order and other changing developments related to COVID-19. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
At its Conference on January 9, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as state bans on same-sex marriage, proof of intent in a constructive discharge case, personal jurisdiction to award a no-contact order, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:42 am
Current and former spouses are eligible along with people who lived together for at least 90 days in the previous year and people who had sexual relations within a year before the filing of the petition. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 6:37 am
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Regional Director John J. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:55 am
Notably, the new program broadens the scope of qualifying technologies to include technologies relating to the treatment of cancer by modalities other than immunotherapy and also includes some technologies relating to cancer detection. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:16 am
First day motions filed so far include: Motion for an Order (A) Authorizing Debtors to Continue Use of Their Centralized Cash Management System, Existing Bank Accounts and Business Forms, and (B) Waiving, on an Interim Basis, the Deposit and Investment Requirements of Section 345 of the Bankruptcy Code Motion for an Order (I) Authorizing Payment of Prepetition Wages, Compensation, Employee Benefits, Expense Reimbursement and Related Items, and the… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:38 am
A New York Family Lawyer said that, in a proceeding pursuant to article 3-A of the Domestic Relations Law (the Uniform Support of Dependents Law), petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court Queens County, dated November 1, 1976, which denied her motion for a "rehearing and reconsideration" of an order of the same court, dated April 12, 1976, which, on her application for increased child support, directed the respondent father to pay $50 per week for the… [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 10:37 pm
On the latter point, that is whether a new petition was required to be filed or not, the CLB, in the last paragraph of the order, i.e. paragraph 85(vii) has issued direction which is in the nature of direction for amendment of the original company petition. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:34 pm
Marriage dissolution petition. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
Commonwealth was an objectively unreasonable application of Graham v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
These assets were blocked by Executive Order 13,599 in February 2012, and Congress passed § 8772 in August in that same year. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
We have created a new facebook group to address the impact of the new executive order and other changing developments related to COVID-19. [read post]
30 May 2008, 7:32 am
The petitions appears to be related: In re McAllen Medical Center, No. 06-0098, and In re Starr County Memorial District, No. 06-0105. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:14 pm
” USCIS will continue to adjudicate and process applications and petitions filed for or on behalf of individuals in the United States, as well as applications and petitions for individuals outside of the United States, and applications for adjustment of status to permanent residence, irrespective of the beneficiary’s country of nationality. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
Thus, the Court found him removable and ordered him removed in absentia. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:00 am
The New York City Transit Authority [NYCTA] denied a former employee [Plaintiff] re-employment because he had been convicted of criminal possession of a firearm.Plaintiff brought a CPLR Article 78 action and subsequently appealed Supreme Court's dismissal of his petition seeking a court order directing NYCTA to approve his application for reemployment. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:00 am
The New York City Transit Authority [NYCTA] denied a former employee [Plaintiff] re-employment because he had been convicted of criminal possession of a firearm.Plaintiff brought a CPLR Article 78 action and subsequently appealed Supreme Court's dismissal of his petition seeking a court order directing NYCTA to approve his application for reemployment. [read post]
