Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 2:22 pm
These concerns arose after the company’s officers learned in 2009 that there were FCPA violations in Vietnam, Thailand, and Russia. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:04 am
For cashless exercises of stock options, due to Section 402 of Sarbanes-Oxley, we: - Don't allow Section 16 insiders to conduct cashless exercises at all - 10% - Don't allow Section 16 insiders to conduct cashless exercises through our plan's captive broker (so they have to use their own broker) - 7% - Don't allow executive officers to conduct cashless exercises through our plan's captive broker but do allow directors to - 2% - Allow Section 16 insiders to conduct cashless… [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:45 am
Restitutive clawbacks were sanctioned by Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304 in response to allegations in the early 2000s that executive compensation was boosted by financial misreporting. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm
A comment that I saw on Steve Bainbridge's blog sounds like an interesting way to respond to the claim that law schools all too commonly mislead students about the schools' employment data: [A]pply Sarbanes-Oxley to college admissions, bursar, and career placement offices, with university presidents having to certify the data. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:31 am
The majority’s reasoning placed heavy emphasis on the purposes of Sarbanes-Oxley in preventing fraud at public companies. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
They announced the blessing from the Office of Management and Budget for a "real-world" cost-benefit study on the Act's internal control provisions, to be carried out jointly by the SEC's Office of Economic Analysis, the Office of the Chief Accountant, and the Division of Corporation Finance. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:30 am
Joanne Oxley is the Communication Manager for EPA’s Office of Administration and Resources Management. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:12 pm
Mary Hartman Morris, Calpers Investment Officer for Global Equity, said that failure to supervise is one more step toward audit quality and is tied to key quality performance indicators. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:23 pm
On December 16, 2011, the United States Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board issued important decision for whistleblowers and their advocates to end a year of landmark Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) decisions by the ARB, including: Vannoy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
The much vaunted challenge to the constitutionality of the PCAOB and of Sarbanes-Oxley itself has ended with a whimper rather than a bang. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
” Particularly in the post Sarbanes-Oxley world, a company’s CCO is a “linchpin in organizational efforts to comply with applicable law. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:15 pm
A comment that I saw on Steve Bainbridge's blog sounds like an interesting way to respond to the claim that law schools all too commonly mislead students about the schools' employment data: [A]pply Sarbanes-Oxley to college admissions, bursar, and career placement offices, with university presidents having to certify the data. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:56 am
., the clerk's office called to inform me that my request for an extension of time was denied. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 8:31 am
Please contact Jim Eccleston at the Eccleston Law Offices at 312-332-0000 to discuss your matter. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 2:31 pm
” Sarbanes-Oxley Act § 307, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 8:46 am
Feinberg is an "officer" of the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:53 pm
Similarly, the examiner found colorable claims against the Lehman senior officers who oversaw and certified the firm’s misleading financial statements. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:53 am
No, today, we’re talking about Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Protection. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:09 pm
The Court also held that the disgorgement remedy authorized under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), which prohibits retaliation against a whistleblower who makes disclosures required or protected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, among other laws, does not apply extraterritorially. [read post]
