Search for: "Other Interested Parties Amended" Results 161 - 180 of 18,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2018, 9:18 am by Miquel Peguera
The explicit permission to gather personal data from web pages and other public sources – which are not defined – is likewise hard to justify on the grounds of public interest. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:49 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Defendant was served with this complaint but never filed an answer or other responsive pleading, and a default judgment as to liability only was entered in December 2009. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
  So, we have no Fourth Amendment interest to protect in keeping it from the government. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Andrew Janson
This information is intended to inform interested parties on the financial standing or other condition of the state government that may have an effect on the bonds. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:54 am by Paul Protos, Contributing Editor
Paul Protos is president and cofounder of ATR Inc., a third-party administration and benefits consul [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:54 am by Paul Protos, Contributing Editor
Paul Protos is president and cofounder of ATR Inc., a third-party administration and benefits consul [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
§ 1334(b) and the Standing Order of Reference, Amended General Order No. 05‐02 (S.D. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am by Nathaniel Sobel
The parties next disputed whether geofence warrants can be squared with the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:52 am by Margaret Taylor
Section 215 currently allows the government to obtain a FISA court order requiring third parties, such as telephone companies, to hand over any records or other “tangible thing” if deemed “relevant” to certain types of investigations including those related to international terrorism, counterespionage or foreign intelligence. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:19 am by Paul Protos, Contributing Editor
The Issue Snapshot posted on the IRS website on May 31 analyzes some of the implications of amending a CB plan to actually or potentially decrease the interest crediting rate. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:19 am by Paul Protos, Contributing Editor
The Issue Snapshot posted on the IRS website on May 31 analyzes some of the implications of amending a CB plan to actually or potentially decrease the interest crediting rate. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Chris Seaton
” Boiled down to plain English, if you give information to a third party, and that party gives that information to law enforcement, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy and there’s no Fourth Amendment violation. [read post]
 The BOE often develops such guidance in conjunction with representatives from local governments and taxpayers and holds monthly public meetings to allow interested parties the opportunity to voice their opinions in these matters. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm by Steve Satterfield
  “Sought” by whom (the video tape service provider, the consumer or a third party)? [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In other words, since 2017, it has been illegal for the Law Society to donate to political parties. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:10 pm by David Schleicher
  Often this is by design, with formally non-partisan elections; other times it is due to dominance by one party. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:54 am by Katharina Schmid
The parties to opposition proceedings may jointly request a kind of “cooling-off” period in order to find an amicable solution. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 1:22 pm by Jamie Williams
In this case, a group of citizens called Naperville Smart Meter Awareness challenged Naperville’s policy of requiring every home to have a smart meter, objecting on Fourth Amendment and other grounds. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:53 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
Supreme Court reversed, holding that sufficient protections for First Amendment interests were built into the Fourth Amendment standard for issuance of a warrant: [P]rior cases do no more than insist that the courts apply the warrant requirements with particular exactitude when First Amendment interests would be endangered by the search. [read post]