Search for: "Ovalles v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
Here is the opening: The United States is deeply divided over the war. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:05 pm
Christopher V. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:12 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the ruling in 2010. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Solicitor General, judge and vice president of the United States. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:53 pm
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
He filed more than 400 petitions, motions, and briefs in the Supreme Court of the United States, and orally argued 13 cases there, including Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:16 pm
When presented with such arguments, the Board often cites to Winner Int’l Royalty Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:31 pm
See Exergen, Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
Prejudice has no place in the United States of America. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
Ancon Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
As November draws near, most of the country is debating who will get to sit in the Oval Office; but over in a corner of the highest level of the American legal community, the fight is over who will get to stand before the Supreme Court to argue Carcieri v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
