Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 161 - 180
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 4:24 am
Sarbanes-Oxley Turns 10! [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Keeping an ethical wall between trades and analysts is fundamental – and, ever since Sarbanes-Oxley 2002, has been legally mandatory in the US, so if any of these traders were doing business in America, they’re looking at jail. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:10 am
[James McDonald/Fisher & Phillips, HR Morning, Boston Herald, related editorial] As critics warned at the time, Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing provisions make a versatile weapon for employment plaintiffs [Daniel Schwartz] “Is Your Job Too Hard? [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:12 am
Commercial and investment banks can both get into trouble when they're not regulated. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:59 pm
In a release, the SEC said the administrative suit marks the first agency enforcement action against a foreign audit firm for allegedly violating Section 106 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
If you're not yet a subscriber, try a no-risk trial now to get the issue rushed to you. [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:20 am
Keeping an ethical wall between trades and analysts is fundamental – and, ever since Sarbanes-Oxley 2002, has been legally mandatory in the US, so if any of these traders were doing business in America, they’re looking at jail. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:53 am
" If it won't, tell your firm that you're going to save them money by spending its resources elsewhere. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:17 am
Plus, the Sarbanes-Oxley stuff has become relatively routine. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:10 pm
Koehler notes that even if Wal-Mart successfully defends the Mexican outlays as lawful “facilitating payments,” the company could still be accused of violating FCPA’s “books and records” and internal control provisions as well as Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:31 am
They’re a mess right now as you can see from trying to use, read or teach Rule 433. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm
And yet they’re all gone today. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am
Title IV This is an attempt to re-vitalize Reg A. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Compliance with the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is not required for the period that a company remains an EGC. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:16 am
Jenkins agreed to re-pay approximately $2.8 million of the over $4 million he received, as discussed here. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
We discussed his book, Corporate Governance After the Financial Crisis, the general shortcomings of policy approaches to financial crises, and the shortcomings of Sarbanes-Oxley, and Dodd-Frank in particular. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:41 am
Moreover, the Court recently re-emphasized this the importance of this decision by upholding pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate personal injury or wrongful death claims against nursing homes. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
And ultimately they’re forced to go public anyway, with the timing imposed upon them by SEC regulations rather than being a matter of their own choice. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm
In an editorial, Bloomberg News warned that the House bill would “gut many of the investor protections established just a decade ago in the 2002 Sarbanes Oxley law. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
An example of this type of development occurred in In re Symmetry Medical, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 66268 (admin proc Jan. 30, 2012). [read post]
