Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2015, 2:57 pm
The Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:54 am
App. 2d 337, 202 P.3d 685 (2009). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
City of Sunnyvale, supra, 193 Cal.App.4th at p. 1035-1036.) [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:25 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:19 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
I, p. 340.)We write today to 'own' that the procedure we approved in Biljac Associates v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:25 am
When the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) entered into an agreement to house P. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:45 am
Fent v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
IHOP v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:44 am
NFP civil opinions today (2): The Uniform House, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
The defendant was too far from the house to be able to obtain evidence or contraband. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Reznitskiy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:54 pm
American Constitution Society Speaker Series McDonald v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) on conspiracy and money laundering charges was unconstitutional, his attorneys contend in a brief filed with a state appeals court Aug. 11 (DeLay v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:59 am
Housing and Community Dev. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm
This bill is an attempt to address a court decision, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona v Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company 205 P.3D 529 (Colo. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 6:18 pm
Organizations for Reform Now v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:09 pm
Today’s press release concerning HUD’s Fair Housing Initiative Program (“FHIP”) says all you need to know about HUD’s approach to eliminating housing discrimination. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
In Kao v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
Their reasoning was based on an old case called R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick and other appeals (1993) 25 HLR 319, in which the House of Lords had held that a person could only apply for assistance as homeless under (then) Pt.3, Housing Act 1985 (now, of course, Pt.7, Housing Act 1996), if he had capacity to understand an offer and reject or accept it. [read post]
