Search for: "PERRY v. BROWN"
Results 161 - 180
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
Brown (formerly known as Perry v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
(Mike points to Justice Thomas’s 2011 dissent in Brown v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
Div. 2010) (citing Perry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:46 pm
Perry v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
The Supreme Court is currently deciding on a challenge by the original proponents of Proposition 8 to keep the video of the Perry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
Selected Filings in Perry v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:31 pm
Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:18 pm
discussing Babasa v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
Kent v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
Analysis of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Brown with Ted Olson and Theodore Boutrous. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
Briefly: At the blog Sentencing Law and Policy, Douglas Berman discusses a recent report in the Sacramento Bee regarding the “implementation challenges for California’s prison realignment” in the wake of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
However, the reasoning in Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry [2012] UKSC 35 is instructive by way of analogy. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:00 pm
” She also cited the more recent Ninth Circuit ruling in Perry v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Stevens (2010) Brown v. [read post]
