Search for: "POLK V US" Results 161 - 180 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On the record before us, plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for legal malpractice. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Shearman note flags the SDNY’s recent decision in Xiang v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434). [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:36 am
In order to comply with subscription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view cases listed below: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that they would have succeeded in the underlying personal injury action "but for" defendants' conduct (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434, 866 N.E.2d 1033, 834 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2007]). [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Tweak the incentives for low-quality patents first – Discussion of ‘Understanding Patent Quality Mechanisms’ by R Polk Wagner (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Innovationpartners) Director Kappos: ‘Patent quality equals granting those claims the applicant is entitled to under our laws’ (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel gets it right about patents (Patent Docs) Patent Buddy releases top 100 law firms list (IP… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
In a February 21, 2014 ruling, Judge Katherine Polk Failla denied in part and granted in part the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
16 May 2010, 12:42 pm by Jeff Gamso
 It was written by Justice Sutherland in Berger v. [read post]