Search for: "POTTER v DISTRICT COURT"
Results 161 - 180
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Any person has standing to bring false patent marking claim: Simonian v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Court will not rewrite claims to avoid nonsensical results: Viskase Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
She never argued that, because legacy preferences are hereditary, they presented a “suspect” classification that should be judged by the “strict scrutiny” standard under the amendment’s equal-protection clause.The district-court judge in the case, Rosenstock v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
In 2000, the court ruled in Sund v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
In a famous Texas water law case, Pecos County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
The court tried again in Bugosh v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm
Perhaps they can reverse the fashion judgments of the district court? [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Evidence of marking required for constructive notice: Von Holdt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm
The district court granted summary judgment in Visa’s favor. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
In April 2009, the Court issued a five-to-four opinion in FCC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
The court comes to the opposite result in State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Harlan II and Potter Stewart (appointed by Eisenhower), Lewis F. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm
And as to underscore the obviousness of the challenges judges face comes a recent case where a Minnesota Appellate Court said that, “In determining the reasonableness and documentation of fees for guardians and conservators, we note that the district court’s task is difficult.” [2] What is “just and reasonable”? [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
Sandoval and Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am
The affidavit played a key role in the court’s denial of the appeal. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
Waterous Co., 347 F.3d 685, 689 (8th Cir. 2003), and a recent district court case, Basso v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:40 pm
The District Court dismissed the action with prejudice, Parker v. [read post]
