Search for: "PRICE v STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 13,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 6:10 am by Cinthia Macie
  In particular, as seen in the Third Circuit’s decision as well as the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:10 am by Cinthia Macie
  In particular, as seen in the Third Circuit’s decision as well as the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 9:59 am by David Adelstein
In Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v General Services Administration, 2024 WL 1953697, CBCA 7759 (CBCA 2024), a contractor entered into a fixed price contract with the government to repair, replace, and modernize site and building systems at a federal building. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by msW1Ld
  California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm by Stephen Wu
The price of a little piracy can be rather steep, as proved in a recent California case. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am by Keith Szeliga
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari on the South Carolina case of Price v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by Daniel Cappetta
” In resolving that question, the Court “applied the four-factor test announced in [United States v.] [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:07 am
Because of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The decisions are In re: New Jersey Title Insurance Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,921 and McCray v. [read post]