Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
On Tuesday, Keisler and Bernstein published a guest post on the Election Law Blog. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
And in the post after that one, I’ll address the remaining argument raised by the CRSCC (and some amici), which is based upon the First Amendment rights of Trump supporters in Colorado. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
Second, Holley's statement that "Newman had written [that a classmate] died from the Covid-19 vaccine" was substantially true. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Nancy Soonpaa’s article Stress in Law Students: A Comparative Study of First Year, Second-Year, and Third-Year Students was cited in the following article: Sam Barder & Jennifer K. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
Second. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
In particular, we must take issue with some serious flaws contained in Professor Kurt Lash's recent writings on this topic, which he has presented in a draft law-review article, titled "The Meaning and Ambiguity of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment," and, in a more telescoped form, as an online essay at the Law and Liberty website, titled "The Fourteenth Amendment's Ambiguous Section Three. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
(Full disclosure: I represent some law professors pro bono as amici curiae in Dell, which is on appeal.) [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
As we state in the article, the Second Confiscation Act "is practically a glossary of terms used in Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment proposed by Congress just four years later. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
This is the second libel action brought by the actor-turned-politician against a Twitter, now X, user who accused Fox of being racist. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Second, they acknowledged that the President obviously does not appoint himself, but countered that the Appointments Clause does not define who are the "Officers of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
Second, our article was devoted to legal analysis—an effort to ascertain the original, objective public meaning of a provision of the Constitution, as part of our must fundamental law. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
Notre Dame law professor Derek Muller responds to Yoo and Delahunty in the latest issue of the Case Western Reserve Law Review, explaining why their theory is wrong. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Bush or Bill Clinton because they are disqualified from the presidency by the Twenty-second amendment. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
” Article I, Sec. 8: The Congress shall have Power … To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Ephraim Professor of Law and Economics and faculty director of the Center on Law and Finance at the University of Chicago Law School; Aurelio Gurrea-Martínez, an Associate Professor of Law and Head of the Singapore Global Restructuring Initiative at Singapore Management University; and Robert K. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Id. amend. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:53 am
A zero-tolerance policy for being accused of sexual misconduct is quite another, at least from the perspective of due process.But whether or not one agrees with the district court’s ruling as a faithful implementation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Parrish’s criticism reflects an ignorance of law in general, and constitutional law in particular. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
If the name "Glossip" sounds familiar, that's because this is Richard Glossip's second case on the SCOTUS plenary docket. [read post]
