Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
G.F., 2021 SCC 20, at para. 74). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:56 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
* Palmer v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Cameron (@JasmineDCameron) Trump – Intelligence Community Trump’s States Goals for the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
This is a view that has been endorsed by English judges in Lawlor (at para 3) and Aquavita International SA v Ashapura Minecham Ltd [2014] EWHC 2806 (Comm) [20], citing inter alia, older editions of Plender and Wilderpin. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The EDPS here referred to the judgment in Case C-70/88 Parliament v Commission, which held that the Court must ‘be able to maintain the institutional balance and, consequently, review the observance of the Parliament’s prerogatives when called upon to do so […] by means of a legal remedy’ (para. 23). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
As such, RBKC had failed to meet the R v Camden LBC ex parte Mohammed (1998) 30 HLR 315 (Admin) criteria, or the statutory code of guidance at para 15.26. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
Yes, by the fact that they wanted neutrality (see para. 32). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
” Crucially, the Court held that the state’s obligation of disclosure in the public interest persists even in emergency situations (para 48). [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
When the EU acts on education via one of these indirect routes, or when Member State action on education falls within the scope of EU law (as in Commission v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The Supreme Court ultimately favoured the criteria in the Discovery Enterprises judgment (Para 110), where it was stated:“40. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
” Even if the question could not be answered by the Secretary of State in every case, “at least the attempt had to be made” (para. 138). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
