Search for: "Parks v. District of Arizona" Results 161 - 180 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 11:38 am by Jack Chin
District Court injunction against Arizona's grant of matching funds. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Judges D. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:26 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, in 2009, in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Chadbourne Rescinds Job Offers to 11 Deferred Associates New York Law Journal Chadbourne & Parke confirmed on Wednesday that it had rescinded job offers to 11 incoming associates it had previously deferred past January 2010. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Hundreds of people were injured and thousands evacuated as a result of the crash on Jan. 6, 2005, when a Norfolk Southern train veered off the main track onto a spur and rear-ended parked railcars. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia 2005). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm by Law Lady
District Court for the District of Arizona on the ground that defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. and Davol Inc. were fraudulently joined because they did not design, manufacture or sell the sling. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Northern District of California’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:40 am
  Jones also shows that the hoopla over Arizona v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:54 am
One of the three decisions, Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:11 am
  Excellent, and lengthy, discussion in both majority opinion and dissent of effect of Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:29 am
Hopper gives the court its first opportunity to consider Arizona v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]