Search for: "Parks v. U. S" Results 161 - 180 of 809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” The statute’s “arose from” language is interpreted strictly to exclude claims that merely “relate to” but do not actually “arise out of the same transactions or occurrences” (SCM Corp. v Fisher Park Lane Co., 40 NY2d 788, 792 [1976]; see Levy v Kendricks, 170 AD2d 387, 388 [1st Dept 1991]). [read post]