Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 28,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by Record on Appeal
Yesterday, the Hawaii Supreme Court granted cert in a tax case styled CompUSA Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm by Diane Marie Amann
Among them is the United States, which, Roberts explained, “gave domestic effect” to the obligations it had assumed under that treaty in 1998, when it passed the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:37 am by admin
Ultimately, Justice Sigurdson found that initial interest confusion passing off was not established on the facts in British Columbia Automobile Assn. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by [email protected]
The post Bill to Raise the Age of Criminal Responsibility to 18 is Passed by Texas House appeared first on Dallas Criminal Defense Attorneys |State & Federal Lawyers. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by [email protected]
The post Bill to Raise the Age of Criminal Responsibility to 18 is Passed by Texas House appeared first on Dallas Criminal Defense Attorneys |State & Federal Lawyers. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am by Jani
In the United States, under various State legislation, an individual's personality or persona can be protected; something that isn't protectable per say under UK legislation.Some faces are just made for t-shirtsNevertheless, the protection offered under passing off can potentially extend to individuals, at least on a prima facie application of the requisite elements: there has to be goodwill associated with that individual; a misrepresentation as to that goodwill… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Ilya Somin
Whatever the fate of the PRPA, many valuable reform laws have passed at the state level since Kelo, and several state supreme courts have ruled that economic development takings are forbidden under their state constitutions. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:35 am
Passing an examination does not give an eligible a right to demand that he or she be appointed from the eligible listPaolini v Nassau County, Supreme Court, Justice Winick, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]The fact that an individual passes an examination does not give him or her any right to demand that he or she be appointed from the eligible list. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:48 am
In that case: The court concluded that Congress did not validly abrogate the states' 11th Amendment immunity when it passed GERA (at... [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New York (EEOC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 1:51 am by war
Jack Brabham Engines Limited v Beare [2010] FCA 872 [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
 See Board of Trustees of State University of N.Y. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
  The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]