Search for: "Patel v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am by Eric Goldman
Because “[t]he link between fantasy and intent is too tenuous for fantasy [alone] to be probative,” United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Lyle Denniston
Patel — constitutionality of local ordinance permitting police to search hotel guest lists Chappell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
  Avi Schick and Kiran Patel preview the case for Slate. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:23 am by Don Cruse
Two cases are on the docket: ASHISH PATEL, ANVERALI SATANI, NAZIRA MOMIN... v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Midcounties Co-Operative Ltd, R (on the application of) v Tesco Stores Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 841 (29 July 2010) Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908 (29 July 2010) Aylott v Stockton- On- Tees Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 910 (29 July 2010) GR & Ors (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 871 (29 July 2010) W (Algeria) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 898 (29 July… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Monday 26 March 2012 are the appeals from the Supreme Court of Mauritius of Dookee  v The State of Mauritius and anor and Sakoor Patel and ors v Anandsing Beenessreesing and Sicom Ltd. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am by Laura Sandwell
Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD, heard 3 July 2013. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:46 am by Laura Sandwell
Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD, heard 3 July 2013. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Comment This decision was recently applied in Patel [2017] EWCA Civ 2028, where among other things the decision in Chavez-Vilchez (C-133/15, EU:C:2017:354, see here) was held not to alter the Zambrano doctrine and merely served as a reminder that the Zambrano principle had to be carefully applied focussing on whether the EU citizen child or dependant could remain in the UK in practice rather than in legal theory. [read post]