Search for: "Paul v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 9,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 11:52 am
And of course, Justice John Paul Stevens—who spent most of his late retirement in Fort Lauderdale—was quite clear in his dissenting opinion in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:39 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, dissenting in Boy Scouts v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 4:13 am
NigeriaMedia Rights Agenda v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:18 am
" Saxe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:02 am
"Bragg’s press release in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer that question in Corner Post v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:30 am
Ken Levy (Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Paul M. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
For instance, in Canada, as Paul Daly powerfully shows, deference is recognized in many areas of the law and was entrenched and affirmed in a recent canonical judgment of the Canadian Supreme Court (called Vavilov). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
For instance, in Canada, as Paul Daly powerfully shows, deference is recognized in many areas of the law and was entrenched and affirmed in a recent canonical judgment of the Canadian Supreme Court (called Vavilov). [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
Paul Gillen & Kevin Gallagher, Lexology: Social media and protected beliefs at work: the Belfast Industrial Tribunal has recently rejected two claims of unfair dismissal following sectarian (anti-Catholic) chants posted on social media. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Tingley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 10:21 am
Further reading: Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Paul C. [read post]
