Search for: "People in Interest of Martinez" Results 161 - 180 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
., 268 So. 2d 363, 366 (Fla. 1972), that provides “full medical care and wage-loss payments for total or partial disability regardless of fault,” Martinez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
., 268 So. 2d 363, 366 (Fla. 1972), that provides “full medical care and wage-loss payments for total or partial disability regardless of fault,” Martinez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that the MVD tracking process reflects that this likelihood of no insurance is ninety percent or greater.State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:44 pm by Mark Ashton
 What made this matter all the more interesting is the fact that for both participants there was a lot at stake. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Interested lawyers should have some criminal defense experience – and preferably some experience working with indigenous peoples (but this is flexible). [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 8:44 pm by Mark Tushnet
Martinez, the outcome of which conservatives have vigorously criticized. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:17 am by David Markus
Forty-nine people died, the worst mass shooting in U.S. history. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Carpenter, 15-1193, on its third relist, asks whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion based on Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Kevin
When it was filed on April 20, the opinion in People v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:46 pm by Sean G. Hanagan
The judge seemingly nailed the coffin shut on the petitioners’ argument by noting that the revision serves the public interest as it corrected a statement that was contrary to statutory authority, and that the plaintiffs failed to show a due process violation, irreparable harm, or a violation of public interest. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Attempts to force more disclosure from outside special interest groups have succeeded in some states. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:39 am by Dave Maass
” Just to be clear: reading a state’s annotated statutes might bore some people to death, but publishing the laws of the land has never killed anyone. [read post]