Search for: "People v Barnes"
Results 161 - 180
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 6:20 am
The justices return to the virtual bench for oral arguments, starting Monday at 10 a.m. with Pham v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:54 am
The first is Apple v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim and Robert Barnes report that “Kavanaugh’s years-old remarks questioning the landmark ruling that forced President Richard M. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Judge Brett M. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
The changes to the law resulted from a widely criticized Indiana State Supreme Court ruling, Barnes v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
By Eric Goldman Mazur v. eBay Inc., 2008 WL 618988 (N.D. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm
The initial Barnes v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:19 pm
However, as the plaintiff in Barnes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
Like McCoy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:18 pm
Britny V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am
Despite its plain meaning approach, the court does try to engage with some precedents: The court cherrypicks stray language from cases like Barnes v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:30 pm
Indiana Supreme Court, Barnes v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Robert Barnes and Anne Kornblut of the Washington Post discuss the considerations that will go into the nomination. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:13 am
Barnes v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:29 pm
Recall that, despite the occasional talk of the First Amendment protecting nude dancing, the Supreme Court has held that a ban on public nudity — and even one that extends into strip clubs — is constitutionally permissible, see Barnes v. [read post]
