Search for: "People v Barton"
Results 161 - 180
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
[Barton, feel free to call!] [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Bush v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
People want these protections provided by that professional status of a lawyer. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am
Some people may know of Dr. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Another example of fairness: TM’s fixation on intent, which Barton Beebe’s work shows is key. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
