Search for: "People v Guy"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" initial people in the opinion. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 12:23 pm
Kaveh Puid (E.C.J.), with introductory note by Guy S. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm
Judge Tallman thinks the guy from Harvard's testimony is "substantial" enough. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:48 am
People who try to predict the results of Supreme Court cases invariably make complete and utter fools of themselves.We're just the guys for the job! [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:41 pm
But something about what's here really strikes at my core.And makes me, or at least a part of me, not care in the slightest what happens to the guy. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
The Court unanimously agrees the guy dies.I will instead highlight just two portions of the opinion. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 740, 742), as may one made four days before trial is to begin (People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
This is not just some crazy guy. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:34 am
Unless the guy incriminates himself, he can be charged.So why not get at it directly? [read post]
Pro Se Filing of the Day: Baylor Law Discriminates Against People Whose GPAs Predate Grade Inflation
25 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
Michael Kamps, Discrimination, Grade Inflation, Grade Reform, Kamps v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
Indeed, that setting the guy free like the federal court did was an "affront to the judges of this state. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
So the guy gets the more favorable good conduct credit regime.Still stays in prison for a long, long time. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:45 pm
A 62-year old man agrees to board your dog for $100/week, you say the dog will be there for only two weeks, you actually leave the dog there for five months, you and a couple of your buddies eventually come to the house and take the dog without paying the guy, later you beg him to take the dog again and he agrees (you still haven't paid him), then you come to his house and try to stab him to death?! [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:21 pm
This time with the right lab technician on the stand to confirm (as required by the Confrontation Clause) that, yep, that's indeed heroin and meth that they seized from the guy. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
At the second trial, the witness was unavailable, so the jury was permitted to read the transcript of his prior testimony, but was not able to actually see the guy. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
You'd think that'd be a sign that the guy's an idiot, not someone you totally want to hang out it (or depend upon).P.S. - Is one of the deceased victim's names really "Allan" Mateo? [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
Everyone also agrees that you can't start a fistfight, while bringing a gun, hoping that the other side will then pull a gun and thereby enable you to shoot 'em.But the majority here says that the relevant CALCRIM instructions here didn't accurately tell the jury (particularly in light of what the prosecutor said during closing) what to do if you elect to bring a gun to a fistfight that you start just in case -- but not hoping -- that the other side has a gun, and then… [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
But what s/he can't do is give "expert" testimony outside of their alleged expertise.So, here, when the police officer testifies that the defendant -- rather than the other guy in the car -- was the actual shooter, based on the testimony of another witness, that's not expert testimony. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:31 pm
Yeah, he was right of center, and yeah, people (including the defendants) did not like that. [read post]
