Search for: "People v Harding"
Results 161 - 180
of 9,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
And though defendant first stepped on his brakes two and a half seconds before the collision, he did not hit them hard enough to engage the Antilock Braking System until one second before impact. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
It's true you don't get a U-visa for endangerment charges, but still, a jury might find the (alleged) change of story relevant and material.Again, the standard is abuse of discretion, so you're going to have a hard time arguing that a trial court made the wrong "403" call on relevance versus prejudice. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Any rights in one’s name do not overcome a conflict with prior rights of another: “use of one's surname is not a ‘defense’ to a trademark infringement action” Sardi's Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
He reminded Nielson that many provisions of the Constitution are important because they affect ordinary people and promote accountability. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:55 am
However, I believe it is a viable alternative for a narrow segment of people who are needing some legal protections but retain even a tiny note hope for their marriage. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
Gates v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:54 pm
The plaintiffs in DeRiggi v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
Getting hooked on Vicodin, it seems, is not a good life, and entails an extremely hard habit to control. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
And yet in a particular case, in which no one is truly injured, it looks like my sentiment in this regard becomes fuzzy and not very hard core. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:50 pm
They're invariably on the "hard core"/progressive music stations, which both proves that the advertisers know their market as well as is likely indicative of what types of stations are probably willing to accept these ads.Still, I found it fascinating that we now have mass media avertisements, over federally regulated airwaves, for a product that is indisputably illegal to possess or sell. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
Harding, 2011 UT 78, 2011 Utah LEXIS 173 (December 16, 2011), on cert. from State v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:36 am
I think this line from today's opinion by Judge Kleinfeld is even funnier when read in isolation.He's describing the "normal" liberties that "regular" people have (as opposed to, say, people on probation). [read post]
24 May 2008, 2:11 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:52 am
That's because the people that publish e-books want that other person to pay to download their own copy. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
"The point is this: Yes, it'd be remarkably random for Wear to interject in a text fight about flirting with people over Facebook that he intended to kill some random guy not involved at all in the whole Facebook dispute. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 pm
In Dobson v. [read post]
