Search for: "People v Lord" Results 161 - 180 of 1,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If you oppose slavery (and Dred Scott), you should oppose Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, Lord Camden, rejected this argument with flourish. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am by Jennifer Davis
As an adult, he was frequently called Ke Ali‘i Maka‘āinana (Prince of the People), for the services he gave to the Hawaiian people. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  The decision was overturned on appeal (Secretary of State for Justice v A Local Authority & Ors (Rev2) [2021] EWCA Civ 1527). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It is a duty of care detached from its moorings (risk of objectively ascertainable physical injury) and then extended into a duty to prevent other people harming each other. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Dado, La Grande Ferme--Homage à Bernard Réquichot (1962-3); CentrePompidou  It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
It is time – in fact it is overdue - to take stock of the increasingly imminent Online Safety Bill. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It would  be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of McNally v Saunders Perhaps emboldened by Warby J’s comments, the Defendant in McNally v Saunders [2021] EWHC 2012 issued an application for strike out and summary judgment in respect of a claim for harassment in which the content complained of largely comprised of statements that the Defendant had published online. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am by CMS
” As noted by Lord Leggatt, English courts have traditionally applied the “same interest” test rigorously, particularly in light of the Court of Appeal’s key ruling in Markt & Co v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 KB 1021. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:43 am by Stephen Mayeaux
It included approximately 12,500 soldiers, 10,000 sailors, and 2,400 enslaved people from Africa. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by John Bellinger
In 2004, British Law Lord Johan Steyn famously called Guantanamo a “legal black hole. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
These are questions that people in England and Wales should give consideration to in taking stock of s 1 of their Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
For example, 130 people (out of 1.2-1.5 million) opted into the price-fixing case against JJB Sports concerning replica football shirts.[13] Likewise, barely 10,000 out of about 100,000 of Morrison’s employees joined the group action against the supermarket chain for unlawful disclosure of private data on the internet by another employee.[14] Furthermore, s.47C (2) of the Competition Act obviates the need for individual assessment of damages, but limits the requirement to prove… [read post]